I’ve been researching vaccines for quite a while now and have seen so much controversy concerning the studies associated with vaccines. One study will say they are perfectly safe and another will say they are not.
I’ve seen studies unpublished after stirring too much controversy and one outright retracted shortly after presenting it in a meeting with a medical professional team.
It often feels like chasing a moving target. The statistics change, new “studies” are funded by the pharmaceutical companies themselves to “prove” their safety and efficacy, and the government agencies make blanket statements, affirming that all is good and well with vaccines.
But is it? Is all good and well?
If you’re just starting to research, I’m sure you have found that it can all be downright overwhelming.
Whom should you trust? What should you believe? How do you make an informed choice?
One option is to take the time to fully research the studies yourself. Put in the time that you would to research a new vehicle, appliance, or home. What you are injecting into your infants and children is far more important and can render far greater consequences.
Here are 50 studies put together by the Vaccine Safety Commission to consider along with this article with embedded studies on the link between vaccines and autism. I’d also encourage you to look up PubMed and read articles like the ones I post on this blog with more links and resources to review. Read both sides of the debate, evaluate all the information, and draw your own conclusion.
What you’ll soon start to see is that the truth is far more potent than any lie the pharmaceutical companies can draw up. Just knowing a few facts and using some good old common sense can help you blast through most of the pharma propoganda you will run across.
Here are 10 vaccine facts that require just a bit of good judgment.
Injecting Poison Does NOT Make You Healthier
I don’t care how they spin it; it just doesn’t add up. Poison is poison is poison. Period.
Vaccines contain some of the most toxic substances known to man: mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, monosodium glutamate, aborted fetal tissue, propylene glycol, glyphosphate, and so much more. If you understand that toxins are bad for you and your health, then you already know that injecting them and bypassing all of your body’s natural defenses isn’t good either.
They’ll say things like “pears and apples have formaldehyde,” so it must be okay and “mercury is in fish.” Or “it’s a different type of mercury–this type is “safe” and “aluminum is in everything-even breastmilk.”
First of all, you don’t inject pears or apples. You digest them and allow the body to remove any toxins via its natural filtration system. Injection skips that process and shoots it all straight into the bloodstream: bacteria, viruses, toxins, all of it.
Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen and doesn’t suddenly become “safe” when injected via a vaccine. Neither does mercury or antifreeze or any of the other toxins they put in them.
And if you looked just a bit deeper at the “safe” ethyl-mercury they say clears the blood in 2-7 days, you’d find that a recent study of primates found that the mercury never really left the body as once thought. It accumulated in the brain as inorganic mercury instead. To date, there is not one study that proves the safety of injecting mercury of any kind.
How is it that injecting 1000+ mcg of aluminum into a 2 month-old in a single visit is “extremely low risk to infants”? It’s not. I don’t care what the FDA says here.
This is what they said in April of 2017 concerning premature neonates. (And for the record, they vaccinate premature infants on the same schedule as those born at term. And no, they don’t test for tissue loading when vaccinating.)
And here, the FDA talked about how much more aluminum is absorbed in human tissues when injected versus ingested. They also talked about how serious aluminum toxicity can be in “selected patient populations, such as neonates” and how it “may be more common than is recognized.”
They talk out of both sides of their mouth in order to push the vaccine agenda. 25 mcg of injected aluminum in an IV solution? Toxic. 1000 mcg of injected aluminum in a single well-child visit? Safe.
This is why using good judgment is so important.
Don’t let them sway you with their propaganda. Injecting poisons does not make anyone healthier, and sadly, our nation’s children are proof of that.
We Don’t Need to Vaccinate 95% of the Population to Keep the Diseases Away
Newsflash–we haven’t seen mortality rates for infectious diseases rise in our country since before vaccines were even introduced. A quick study of history would show what really “eradicated” diseases prior to vaccination efforts: sanitation, quarantine, and good ol’ hygiene, like washing your hands.
When vaccines were first introduced, only two were needed to be “fully vaccinated.” Later 7 vaccines were required, and then 14 vaccines, and now 72 doses from birth to 18 years of age! In the course of those 60+ years, what it meant to be “fully vaccinated” changed significantly, and not once did mortality rates for these infectious diseases increase.
Even if an adult gets annual flu shots and the TDaP, they are still “unvaccinated” by today’s standards, which means that the majority of our population is “unvaccinated.” How will getting a 95% compliance rate change anything?
It won’t. It’s just a good way to make a lot of money.
Babies Don’t Need a Hep B Shot
Hepatitis B is spread via sexual intercourse, tainted needles, and by an infected mother. If none of those apply to your newborn, then it’s safe to say that your baby does not need the Hep B shot.
They don’t need one at birth as is recommended, and they won’t need one at 2 months and thereafter. The only reason it’s on the infant schedule is because they couldn’t convince adults to get the shot. It was easier to throw it into the already-saturated infant schedule and hope no one noticed rather than market it to an uninterested public.
They’ll say things like “now, they’ll be protected from Hepatitis B,” but the truth is, they don’t know how long “immunity” will last, if even acquired. When the adult Hep B shot is only estimated to provide immunity for up to 10 years, it’s highly unlikely that the infant one will be any good when the child may actually be at risk.
Do your baby a favor. Opt out of this one.
The Science is Not Settled
The “experts” like to throw this one around quite a bit. “The science is settled” they say over and over again. Common sense, however, would tell you that they’re lying. Science by definition is the study of inquiry and observation. A quick overview of a vaccine insert would show you that it is really far from settled. In many cases, it hasn’t even started!
Vaccines contain carcinogens or cancer-causing agents, and yet, the insert itself will tell you that they’ve never tested the vaccine for mutagenic (cancer-causing) effects. They’ll also admit in section 8.1 that they’ve never tested vaccines on pregnant women–even though they recommend two of them to every pregnant woman in the nation.
The CDC admits that there are no long-term health studies on vaccines because “it would not be practical.” They’ve refused to conduct a study comparing the overall health of vaccinated and unvaccinated children because they say it would be “unethical.” They also have never studied the recommended vaccine schedule that they try to force on every child from the womb onward.
Vaccines are considered biologics, not medications, so many are not even tested in double-blind placebo studies like all the rest of the pharmaceuticals. And as far as all of those studies that supposedly prove that vaccines don’t cause autism . . . well, they actually only studied two vaccines. Two–if even that.
The science is definitely not settled–especially when all of the supposed “safety” studies are funded by the pharmaceutical companies themselves.
Let’s get some independent studies going, and then let’s talk. Until then, think twice.
If a Child Has an Adverse Reaction, It is NOT Normal
Nowadays, our babies are walking around dosed and medicated from the womb onward. More and more babies are having screaming fits, GERD, ear infections, eczema, seizures, allergies, sleep disorders, etc. It’s sadly becoming common for them to be sick, but it’s not normal.
Read the vaccine insert for yourself–not the one-page handout the doctor will try to give you. Read the adverse reactions section and know what to look for.
If your baby is hurting, stop vaccinating. Just stop.
You can always postpone. You can always change your mind. But you can never undo a vaccine.
High-pitched screaming is a sign of encephalitis or inflammation of the brain. It is not “purple crying” as they’ll try to tell you. And it’s not normal.
Eczema is an autoimmune condition, and in the 1950’s the AAP warned doctors NOT to vaccinate children with eczema and to restrict contact with their vaccinated siblings. Vaccines didn’t just suddenly become “safe” for children with eczema–especially not now since we’ve added about 60 more vaccines to the mix.
Ear infections don’t just happen. all. the. time. It’s a vaccine side effect. A measle-like rash after the MMR is the measles. (Hello, live virus.) Autoimmune conditions are the result of injecting foreign animal and human proteins into the bloodstream, and allergies are what happen when you inject the adjuvant aluminum to increase IgE levels.
No, it’s not a coincidence. No, it’s not “normal.” These are vaccine side effects and adverse reactions. Be aware.
If the Ones Telling You to Vaccinate are Financially Involved, Reconsider
There are two sides to every story. Always.
When the doctor says it’s all or nothing, you need to step back and reconsider why.
Why was it okay to get 14 vaccines in the 1980’s and now it’s grounds for getting kicked out of the doctor’s office? Why is it okay to receive half as many vaccines in another country and be “fully vaccinated” and not so in the U.S.?
Pediatricians are awarded a financial bonus of at least $400 by an insurance company for each and every fully vaccinated child. The catch is that they need to have 63% of all children under the age of 2 fully vaccinated according to the CDC recommended schedule. How’s that for custom support?
Vaccines are a billion dollar industry, and the pharmaceutical companies stand to lose a lot of money if you don’t listen to them. They’ll hit up every news station, school, college, billboard, grocery store, and children’s cartoons to make sure you get the message.
The CDC will do the same thing. They’re not a neutral company as they’d like for you to believe. They own 56 vaccine patents. Conflict of interest, anyone?
Now contrast that to the person called an “anti-vaxxer” down the street, sharing their story on the web. Take a good look at their “following.” Their child could have been maimed and permanently brain damaged, and they’ll be lucky if they get a “like” or little praying hands. Many times, they’ll get dissenters, who will question their story, call them awful names, and shame them.
And yet, they’re still out there day in and day out, warning others of the dangers of vaccines. What do they have to gain from sharing it all?
Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
Except the hope that you will not ever have to go through what they’ve had to endure.
Check motives when someone is telling you what to do. And if they belittle you or kick you out for not injecting everything on their list into your child, then good riddance. Move on.
If the Flu Shot is Not Safe for Infants, It’s Not Safe for Fetuses
This is just common sense. Mothers for the last millenia knew not to inject or consume toxic substances during pregnancy. Even doctors had this one right at one time. . . until the CDC decided otherwise.
The thing is, the CDC recommends waiting until 6 months of age before administering the flu shot to babies, and yet, they push it on every single pregnant mother. They say that it’ll benefit the developing baby because the immunity will be passed on from the mother.
Lies. All lies.
If a 5 month old can’t get a flu shot, then a developing fetus should not either.
And when they say things like, “It’ll go through the mom’s system first, so it’s okay,” they’re just making it all up. The vaccine insert itself says it’s NEVER been tested in pregnancy. Not ever. Not once. Zip.
Do you want you and your baby to be their guinea pigs?
More Vaccines Isn’t the Answer
When we see an outbreak in our country, more often than not, it’s among fully vaccinated individuals. There are numerous reports of pertussis, mumps, and flu outbreaks that often occur right after vaccine campaigns, such as those done at the beginning of each school year.
When these outbreaks happen, do you know what they propose as the solution? More vaccines.
Get a second booster! A third! Whatever it takes.
It’s complete madness, doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Apparently, vaccines can do no wrong.
Instead of loading everyone up with more and more vaccines, maybe we should look at what’s causing the outbreaks to begin with and offer effective treatments.
The pertussis portion of the vaccine, for example, was studied and shown to create asymptomatic transmission of the whooping cough. What the what?! Should we really be recommending this to pregnant moms and family members? Uh, no.
Two whistleblowers claimed that the mumps portion of the vaccine was proven to be ineffective and a lawsuit was filed against Merck for lying about its effectiveness. Yeah, they already know it doesn’t work, and yet, they continue to push for more.
And then, there’s the flu shot. Did you know that a person who gets the flu shot is 5.5 times more likely to get a respiratory illness following vaccination? Yes, you read that right. The vaccinated individual is more likely to get sick after vaccination. Just see what happens after your work place’s next “health drive.”
We read reports in Syria of vaccine-strain polio outbreaks, and again, the call is for more and more vaccines.
At some point, we truly need to take a step back and stop the chaos.
Live-virus vaccines can and do shed. They can and do transmit infection. They can weaken your immune system and make you more susceptible to disease.
Surely, we can figure out a better way.
Your Pre-Teen Does Not Need the HPV Vaccine
This shot carries so much controversy, and I could go on and on about how it was fast-tracked prior to distribution and how it’s never even been proven to prevent cervical cancer. I could also read you the side effects list, which includes autoimmune diseases, but you can look that one up for yourself.
At the end of the day, here’s what you need to know. There are thousands of testimonies of adverse reactions concerning this vaccine. Thousands. And a few hundred deaths.
The reactions have been so extreme that entire countries have filed criminal complaints against this vaccine and have even gone as far as filing class action law suits against the manufacturer.
Need I say more?
Pharma Is Not Held Liable for Vaccine Adverse Reactions
This is why you won’t hear about any lawsuits in this country. In 1986, Congress made it illegal to sue vaccine manufacturers for injuries and deaths concerning vaccines. In the 1980’s, there were about 10 recommended vaccines and 200 lawsuits a year, so the pharmaceutical companies lobbied for freedom from liability.
You heard that right. They knew that people were getting injured and killed by vaccines, and instead of making safer vaccines, they pushed for a law that would protect them instead of the children.
With the swipe of a pen, all of the lawsuits went away, and they could now mold public opinion in their favor. They chose the mantra, “Vaccines are safe and effective. Vaccines save lives.”
After the law was passed, the manufacturers got busy making more and more vaccines. It wasn’t that there was a need for them, and it wasn’t like there were sudden outbreaks that needed to be dealt with. Nope. It was just the perfect opportunity to make money with zero liability or consequence.
They have since pushed the recommended vaccine schedule to include 74 doses of vaccines and are fighting each and every year to add more. In 2011, they even lobbied for more protection. They can now injure and kill our children without liability even if a safer option could have been made available.
How’s that for better health?
Even without a single study, it’s easy to see what truly motivates these companies. . . and it’s not the well-being of our children.
Are you putting your blind trust in them?
There’s plenty of controversy concerning vaccines because there are plenty of lies that we’ve been led to believe. For every study showing the dangers, there are bought-and-paid-for ones claiming they are not true.
At the end of the day, we as parents need to look up the FACTS and use a bit of good judgment to make an informed choice. A little common sense can go a long way in helping us do just that.
Did you find this post helpful? Please share and help me get the word out! For future updates, subscribe to my blog and follow me on Facebook.